I was mildly surprised that it has both VT100 and VT102 support. Most old terminal emulators claim to be VT100 but actually respond as a VT102, or claim to be a VT102 but have features normally found on a VT320.
This might be moot with, say, xterm
, but I do prefer terminals to be close to the real thing – especially given that I one one of the real things: a DEC VT510.
So, I fired it up. connected to a random host, and did some preliminary poking.
Well, so far so good.
The escape sequence there (^[[c
– CSI Ps c – Send Primary Device Attributes) instructs the terminal to respond with essentially a model identification.
Well, not strictly a model, but a family. The first number, 62
, identifies it as a "level 2" terminal: the VT2xx family.
If you wish to run this query yourself, the magic key sequence is esc+v esc [ c
.
Ok, so it claims to be a VT2xx. Let's use vttest
to probe it some more.
Well, that's pretty neat. I think the only other terminal app I'll install is the HP-specific one. I'll use that to connect to my HP-UX machines once they're back up and running. Well, turns out HP's terminal doesn't support winsock.